Celebrity Justice
Brandy Crash -- Dead Woman at Fault?

TMZ has learned the hang-up in deciding whether to file vehicular manslaughter charges against Brandy is that Brandy may have been a victim, not a culprit.

A CHP source tells TMZ the woman who died in the car accident involving Brandy actually struck the vehicle in front of her before Brandy made any contact. The law enforcement source says Awatef Aboudihaj, the woman who died, struck the car in front of her -- which was going 65 mph, and then slammed on her brakes. We're told the sudden stop caused Brandy to hit the dead woman's car.

What's more, L.A. County Coroner spokesperson Captain Ed Winter tells TMZ that toxicology reports show Aboudihaj had "slight traces" of marijuana in her system at the time of the crash.

The L.A. City Attorney has until the end of the business day on Friday to decide whether to file criminal charges against Brandy -- that's when the one-year statute of limitations runs out. Sources tell TMZ there is significant division in the City Attorney's office, and a decision still has not been made. The problem for the City Attorney: if they file manslaughter charges, they have to prove Brandy did something negligent -- and we're told that could be difficult if not impossible.

Stay tuned...


Tags: Brandy, Brandy car accident, Brandy car crash, Brandy sued, BrandyCarAccident, BrandyCarCrash, BrandySued

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 12) Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. In the case of a a multi car chain reaction type of accident the person who caused the initial accident that started the chain is at fault. Put yourself in that position, if someone in front of you causes an accident and you get swept up in it, you are not at fault even if you hit them from behind. I dont think that this has any thing to o w/celebrity if this other woman caused the accident and had drugs in her system I feel bad people have been calling Brandy a murderer for months

Posted at 1:11PM on Dec 26th 2007 by LaLocke

62. some douche with a trailer crushed my mustang while he was backing up,,,now whos fault was that!!!!!!! certainly not mine!!!

Posted at 1:12PM on Dec 26th 2007 by RoughDaddy

63. Petunia, I guess if you were to rearend some stoner after they had hit another car, you would rush to the bank to pay for both cars. Give it a rest. If this was any other person on the street, would you be so gung-ho about them having charges filed against them or whatever? I doubt it. I think you're an idiot!

Posted at 1:12PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Ramma Jamma Alabama

64. Traces of mary jane would indicate she smoked it at least a week ago~ pot stays in the system the longest, so if it was just a trace, it was OLD.

Posted at 1:12PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Petite

65. MY HUSBAND WAS DECLARED NOT AT FAULT when he hit a Lexus from behind.

Three people in the turning lane turned left and immediately crossed over railroad tracks, the first person slammed on his breaks to turn into a driveway, and because all 3 had just crossed a railroad crossing from a turning lane, and thus were very close to each other, the accident was deemed just that, an accident- no fault. Our insurance didn't go up, and my husband didn't get a ticket.

SO THAT BLOWS YOUR "ALWAYS AT FAULT" CLAIM OUT OF THE WATER, SMART ASSES!

Posted at 1:14PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Petite

66. No Surprise Here...
You need to read the posting again. It says that the woman Brandy struck was the one going 65 MPH not Brandy. And were YOU there to know that everyone was slowing down & that traffic was bad? I highly doubt it. If you're the 6th car involved in a 6 car pile up is it safe to say that YOU are the one responsible for the entire accident? I think that if more than 2 vehicles are involved in a pile up accident that the initial rear-ender, the 2nd car, should be the one held responsible seeing as THEY were the ones to rear-end first & the others simply couldn't stop in time to avoid adding to the pile up regardless of how far you're behind especially on the highway.

Posted at 2:34AM on Dec 27th 2007 by MyThoughts

67. The other question is how do they ascertain which impact actually killed the woman. Maybe Brandy was at fault for the accident, but not the death.

Posted at 8:44AM on Dec 27th 2007 by Bluto

68. '& you don't find it rather weird that the dead lady has marijuana in her system?'
pullleeezzz.....marijuana has never killed anyone & a trace amount is nothing. I had to laugh at that report. who cares about marijuana.
& i agree about the person behind not always being at fault.....
however, most of the time they are.

Posted at 1:21PM on Dec 26th 2007 by here&bored

69. THE lady had "MARIJUANA" DRUGS!!! ... IN HER SYSTEM!! they NEVER talk about that... so her driving was DISTORTED! CASE CLOSED = BRANDY is not Guilty!

Posted at 1:22PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Bigma

70. Previous reports said that Brandy was traveling at high speed and braked to avoid striking the vehicle in her path; as the result she also veered into the lane next to the lane Brandy had been traveling in - which was the path of the dead woman.

Something smells like a fishy cover-up here. Smells like $$$ in the Los Angeles D.A. office yet again. He is up for re-election soon and needs the young, A-M votes.

Posted at 1:22PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Emer\\\'gen-C

71. You said it RoughDaddy not me. Some douche hit your mustang while HE was backing up. Damn MEN drivers!

Posted at 1:25PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Kelli

72. petite--How embarrassing to have such a douche for a husband.

Posted at 1:28PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Blue

73. 43. The dead woman shot herself in the head, then hit the car in front of her at 65 mph, than put the car in reverse and hit brandy.

Posted at 12:40PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Mikey

HAHAHAHAHA! Likely Scenario.....

Posted at 1:30PM on Dec 26th 2007 by Oh, Hell to the NO!

74. I was in a three car accident, I was the third car. I wasn't tailgating either. The First car stop on the high and the second
car hit the first and I hit him. It's hard to just stop at fifty five miles.

Posted at 9:24PM on Dec 26th 2007 by The Truth

75. I truly believe that the people who are writing these stupid brandy fault post, don't have a drivers liscence and
don't drive.

Posted at 9:26PM on Dec 26th 2007 by The Truth

Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments